Policy Brief

Anti-Racism Consortium | November 2023

The Effect of Structural Racism on the COVID-19 Planning and Response for Racial and Ethnic Minorities and Other Marginalized Communities: An Ohio Case Study©

Johnnie (Chip) Allen, MPH

Executive Summary

Structural racism within governmental institutions was reflected in the response to COVID-19. As defined by Dr. Paula Braveman, Arkin, Proctor, Kauh, and Holms, “systemic and structural racism are forms of racism embedded in systems, laws, policies, entrenched practices that perpetuate widespread unfair treatment of people of color.” Braveman et al distinguishes systemic racism from structural racism by stating that “systemic racism emphasizes the involvement of whole systems,” whereas “structural racism emphasizes the role of the structures (laws, policies, institutional practices, and entrenched norms) which is the system’s scaffolding. This brief will provide specific examples of how structural racism, which is the ways that laws, policies, institutional practices, and entrenched norms disadvantage racial and ethnic minority individuals, impacted the COVID-19 response.

For example, the behavior of decision-makers at all levels of government in ignoring scientific information about COVID-19 had devastating effects, which disadvantaged racial and ethnic minority individuals. Structural racism combined with the political determinants of health (systematic process of structuring relationships, distributing resources, and administering power) often took precedence over science and prevented racial and ethnic minority individuals from being healthy. This was illustrated by governmental leaders’ refusal to enforce mask requirements for indoor spaces and actions that cast doubt about the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. Not only was this problematic for the nation, but also particularly challenging for marginalized communities, which includes racial and ethnic minorities, low-income households, and households whose limited square footage and physical layout made it difficult to self-isolate. The existence of a widespread anti-structural racism policy could have prevented unnecessary deaths, and the disruption of the economic stability and social fabric of communities. States like Ohio provide an appropriate case-study to illustrate this point.

Hear the Author in Conversation

"Navigating Resistance to Health Equity"

In this episode of the Critical Futures podcast, Arthur R. James and Johnnie (Chip) Allen talk about their efforts to combat structural racism in the healthcare system – and the deeply-embedded resistance they have navigated in pursuit of health equity.

More from the Consortium

Anti-Racism Consortium Reports

Consortium members worked to produce reports offering insights on the state of philanthropic funding and anti-racist public health initiatives, including the collaborative final report: “Anti-Racism Funding Practices: Transforming Public & Private Philanthropic Funding.”